One of the most overused bits of conventional political wisdom is…..
That the decline in the number of seriously contested congressional races is a very bad thing. This is because overwhelmingly Republican or Democratic districts allow each party’s nominees to ignore moderate swing voters and only rely on their base to get elected. This drives both parties to the extremes and contributes to political polarization and division.
This sounds measured and thoughtful, but like so many other cliches is often used to conceal a hidden agenda. It’s usually illustrated by citing right wing Republicans like Marjorie Taylor Green, Lauren Boebert and Paul Gosar. The mirror image of this on the left, radical Democrats like Ilhan Omar, Sandy Cortez and Rashida Tlaib from overwhelmingly blue districts-is never mentioned.
This hypocrisy is employed predictably by the Kansas City Star and local Democratic activists (but I repeat myself!) regarding the current congressional redistricting process in Kansas.
Because of population shifts reflected in the 2020 census, maps have to be redrawn in Congress and state legislatures. If a U.S. House of Representative’s district in Kansas has more than 733,000 residents it will have to give up territory and population to get back to the target figure.
In response to this constitutional mandate, the Republican leadership in the Kansas legislature has come up with a plan that would, among other changes, move the northern two-thirds of Wyandotte County from Sharice Davids‘ 3rd Congressional District to Jake LaTurner’s 2ndCongressional District. It proposed a new boundary based on Interstate Highway 70, with the part of the county north of the highway added to the 2ndDistrict and the part south of I-70 remaining in the 3rd District.
From the wailing and the gnashing of teeth by Governor Kelly and other Democratic politicians this was a vicious racist act tantamount to reinstating the poll tax and literacy tests.
Their arguments are as follows:
- It’s unjust that Wyandotte County and its residents be divided between two congressional districts. But where does it say in the U.S. Constitution that a county or a city or any other local political subdivision must be contained in a single congressional district?
The City of Kansas City, Missouri has territory in both the 5th District of Democrat Emmanuel Cleaver and the 6th District of Republican Sam Graves. Jackson County, Missouri was split for years between the urban 5th District and the rural 4th District which took in Independence and the rest of eastern Jackson County.
2. You can’t gerrymander a minority community out of electing one of its own to represent it in any electoral district it is the majority in, i.e. a “majority-minority” district. There is,however, no affirmative duty to concentrate all minority voters in a single electoral district in order to elect white Democrats. A big distinction but one that seems to have escaped the Star and other Democratic partisans. (By the way, the southern portion of WyCo that remains in the proposed 3rd District has plenty of black and Hispanic residents. I was born in Wyandotte and have worked in Wyandotte County a lot of my adult life. I know!)
3. One man’s meat is another man’s poison, i.e. any perceived Democratic loss in the 3rd District is offset by a Democratic gain in the 2nd. Does anyone doubt that if Wyandotte County had been part of the 2nd District in 2018 when Democratic Congressman Paul Davis lost there by only 2,000 votes he would have won?
4. Another argument the Star and other Democratic partisans make is the “cultural anomaly” ploy. The gist of this is that it is too jarring for the enlightened residents of college towns like Lawrence and Manhattan to be lumped in with conservative rural communities in the 1st District stretching into western Kansas.
This reminds me of a mindset which I call Lawrence snobbery. Continue reading →